Many people are happy with this war but no one like the Globalists; they have a new event in their hands to divide the herd and test how well their soft power tools work. The media and adjacent capital have cancelled Russia from “western” civilisation in another coordinated attack like the ones we saw during COVID, the trucker protests and the 2020 election fraud. We know they lie, and they know how many of the herd don´t follow with the program. After the unvaccinated they have turned their attention to the Russians.
This soft power is the only power that the foxes who run the show are able to use, because they live for images and symbols and they die by them. Violence doesn’t look in social media and TV (the ones in which Blackrock hasn’t invested already) so cancellation from access to financial markets, Hollywood entertainment and porn is the way. “This will shame you”, they think in a display of gynocratic fervor.
But it remains to be seen how this will hurt Russia in the long run. As a right wing inhabitant of a western European GAE colony I have often dreamed of my country banning pornhub, Netflix and many other anticultural artefacts. But my country doesn’t have any importance because we are already conquered by GAE, unlike Ukraine, and that is the whole point of this war.
The tentacles of GAE have been cultivating Ukraine for almost two decades, trying to buy into their politics via elite acquisition and NGOs that spread left wing social liberalism. It was logical step for them to take and a win-win; if the subversion was completed without any Russian kvetching they would control a pivotal area in world politics, with access to a hot area with great importance to Turkish and Russian geopolitics. If, on the contrary, Russia went berserk then a perfect excuse will present itself to cut them from central european politics, and attract Germany and the EU (same thing) into the“the western” (Washingtoong) area of influence even more than ever before.
This is why their subversion cannot take a single simplistic approach. GAE knows this and this is why it has to cultivate all the sides of the political landscape in their new colonies, even the “political extremists” have to be courted before the inevitable purge happens once “democracy” is “consolidated”: you can´t dethrone the Emperor of Japan, but you can dissolve the imperial cult and make him human, like any other “European Monarch”. Also, you can´t create a Republic in Spain after Franco, you need to recognise a Bourbon doofus as King so that the monarchist elites are happy when we purge all those Carlist reactionaries from our new Iberian liberal democracy.
This same subversion has being going in Ukraine for a long time, were the tradition of anti-Russian Ukrainian nationalism is especially feverous since WWII on the right. The dollars had been flowing into Bandera inspired organisations that participated in the Maidan long before 2013. Since then the grip that GAE has on Ukraine has been stronger and many individuals have made connections with right wing dissidents across the Atlantic.
One of them is Olena Semenyaka, Azov´s International Secretary. This Ukrainian nationalist activist has been making the rounds in of Euro and American dissident and white nationalist circles for years, attending as well as organising events in the western right-wing sphere. Virtually all the attendants to her events have come in strong support of Ukraine during this war and disparaged any geopolitical or Russian explanation of why the conflict is happening. Not naming names but, if you are on twitter you know all of them.
A revelatory interview from March 6 that appeared in counter currents serves as an explanation of the plans that Ukrainian nationalists see for the war and their place in the Zelensky government. Despite the current onslaught in Kiev and Mariupol she sees the delusional Ukrainian numbers of Russian casualties as veridic “if you take into account the cargo planes and the number of destroyed enemy columns” and she also sees Moscow as a “rapidly” transforming “into a huge North Korea” in which a “change in the regime is highly probable”.
Her vision completely aligns with western überpropaganda (note they added her bitcoin address in the article for warbucks). To her victory looks like “The overthrow of the regime in Russia, which will result in its own demilitarization and the termination of its geopolitical expansion to the West”, echoing the kind of wet dreams parroted by Lindsey Graham and other politicians in Fox News.
This is not a irrelevant figure in their movement, new members of international fighters are still arriving in Ukraine led by this beliefs, were reports are coming of fighters not being supplied with weapons and concrete military goals. Many takes are going around that the goal of this international legions is to serve as an info op in social media. If the worst happens and they get blown into pieces then the Ukrs also have something to feed the foreign media.
But what justifies this endgame and the use of this U.S. State Department talking points? If the right sector, Azov and other right wing milita organizations had a grand plan to take the Ukr government from the US puppets that runs it then the use of the NATO weapons and the money, weapons from the “enemy”, would be justified. Politics is a dead end for them, they failed to get any representation in parliament and Svoboda, the closest mainstream political party to their views, has only one seat in parliament. However, if the aim of this moment for them is to defeat Russia and then take power in an independent Ukraine then Wignats would be in the right that Azov can save whites from GAE and the Russian horde. But, unfortunately, this is not the plan at the moment, their goals are explained by geopolitical 4-D chess.
Semenyaka and other activists in Ukraine are inspired by the geopolitical plan of “intermarium”, a plan to create a new geopolitical order in eastern europe. No, this is not another pipedream by George Friedman and his Stratfor eunuchs but a long standing Polish nationalist idea which, ironically, the Bandera scions (he killed Poles and is considered a war criminal in Poland) have incorporated to their ideology. The plan calls for an alliance of eastern European countries that could create a new geopolitical pole that mediates between Germany and Russia. It is an early XXth century idea that, given the current post WWII atlanticist world order leaves doubt about how powerful can it get before Washingtoon clamps down. Also, Germany is an industrial vacuum cleaner and the EU is its “biatch”, so even if all these countries add up to more than a 100 million people it remains to be seen if they could really have the technological strength to face Germany and the Eternal “anglo”.
Unfortunatly for them the war has only strengthened the ukranian establishment. Zelensky is is the new David Schwimmer, the husband that all the old AWFLs want for their downtrodden daughters. Because western politicians are spiritually female he is getting standing ovations in all Anglo parliaments and visits from Eastern euros, who are more worried by the Russian bear than about creating a new geopolitical area, so they are open for Daddy US missiles. Also, western euros haven’t forgotten that their sacred peoples, the gays and immigrants, are being hurt by the reactionary Pollacks and Huns, so they are pushing to saction them and cut their funds. So the eastern countries are at the moment getting f4ck3d and paying for it.
In a game of international politics with transnational superstates and transational corporation you don’t win as an small country by playing geopolitics, the best result is to not lose massively and this is where Ukraine stands: the second scenario I described as an American pawn sacrifice, where they get rekt and Biden comes to the rescue of Nato, cancelling Nordstream 2 in the process.
This is why the only ones that could have a point in the dissident right by supporting the ukrs are the Richard Spencerino gang. With their euro flags and Emperor Macron memes they are correct that western Ukraine is probably “destined to the EU or NATO”. Fake antiwoke discourse notwithstanding they are correct in that being what is in store for Ukrs, even though their white apollonian EU is as utopian as an ant trying to climb the Mont Blanc. No Ritchie, “history” is not pointing towards that, stop with the Hegelian nonsense. And no, if you don´t respect the whole liberal tranny kids package you don´t have the right to call nobody (like Zemmour) “reactionary” (read this with extremely feminine voice).
In the end this is a story about how liberal elites need radical political ideologies to fight their wars, pitting nationalisms against each other for their benefit. Milquetoast liberalism is not an ideology that sends someone to a battlefield as Burnham said, it isn´t as powerful as all the ideologies that liberalism murdered after the second world war and it´s triumph in the cold war. Now liberalism sees those damn reactionaries returning and their best option is to throw its money behind the Azov batallion and other natziiie comandos. Somehow, those ideologies that they de facto banned after Nuremberg are useful again.
Their usefulness isn´t limited to the trenches but also to cyberspace. Right wing groups in Ukraine have collaborated with the Ukrainian social media blitzkrieg by trying to generate sympathies with the European right wing. In the videos that they share online there are always flags from foreign right wing movements that not even the people from the said countries even recognise. Even Poroshenko has joined the performative fascism telegram crowd with the “Banderamobile”. The aim is clear, direct right wing fringe groups in the internet away from the Putler camp and even some of them into the real Ukrainian battlefields.
This fascism simulacra only serves the powers that occupy the puppet regime. This is why the invocation of jüngerism that some in the right are advocating is uncalled for in this case. “Well at least they fight for something” they say. Even if this international and Ukranian fighters gained combat experience it would be fruitless if the PLAN and the objectives are wrong like BAP explained. This bottom up romantic view of nationalism is wrong.
The biggest problem of Euro and “western” politics has been the complete absence of foreign policy realism for a long time. This is a problem shared by neocons, liberals and white nationalists. The consequences have been disastrous for the west, with entire countries destabilised, spawning jihadi terrorism, eradicating middle east christians, and displacing millions of refugees into Europe. The elites didn´t get punished for this and they continue to ethnically replace western and northern European populations despite the assertions of some right wing euro balts that “things are getting better man, just don´t support Putin”.
The idea would be powerful if it didn´t came from people who are going to be minorities in their own countries in less than 20 years. Those of us who support Putin in this are doing it because we see that history is not full of states and Empires who just “fell from within” from it´s own decadence, but were pushed by an ascending or competing Empire. Northern euro ethnic grievances are not European grievances and we are seeing in the erratic behaviour of Visegrad and northern European conservative parties that their grievances are being used as a way to “dare” the rest to support the Russian point of View.
We are at an “hour of decision” in history, the geopolitics of the coming decades are at the crossroads. If the degenerate GAE subversion of Ukraine is a success they will be emboldened for another 20-30 years, celebrating that their pawn sacrifice worked and coalescing against their remaining enemies. However, if the Russian bear triumphs then a new order will be formed in the east to counterbalance the atlanticist powers. This is not just about “Tsar Putin setting the third Rome to be Emperor of all whites” as other dissidents say. In the end the strawman is the only thing they are willing to fight just because the strawman is the only thing they have.